Kip's Korner

Most sportsmen and women realize that hunters are the backbone of wildlife management programs and

that they fund the lion’s share of our state wildlife agencies. Most also know that hunter numbers are in
a steady decline, but fewer realize that the number of big game hunters is only slightly declining or that

some states actually have more hunters today than a decade ago. Let’s look at some of the more
meaningful statistics and gauge the positive impacts hunters – and especially deer hunters – have on

society.




Data sources – The following data are from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s (USFWS) 2006

National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation, the National Shooting Sports Foundation’s (NSSF) 2007 Industry Reference Guide, and the Congressional Sportsmen’s Foundation’s (CSF) 2007 report, Hunting and Fishing: Bright Stars of the American Economy. The USFWS report

used data through 2006 for hunters 16 years and older while the NSSF report used data through 2005 for hunters of all ages. The years and data sets aren’t exact but the numbers are still comparable, especially

when viewing five and 10-year trend data.





Hunters by the numbers – According to the USFWS, 5% of the U.S. population 16 years and older

hunted in 2006. That was roughly 12.5 million hunters. Of those hunters, 10.7 million (86%) hunted

big game and 10.1 million (94%) of those hunted deer. These numbers suggest deer hunters comprised

about 81% of all hunters 16 years and older in 2006. This highlights the importance of deer hunting and

re-emphasizes that deer drive the hunting industry. In 1996 there were 14 million hunters (16+ years),

so we lost around 10% of them by 2006. This isn’t a preferred trend, but it’s worth noting during that

decade the number of big game hunters remained relatively consistent with only a 5% decline and only

a 2% decline from 2001 to 2006.



Hunters lost and found – According to NSSF, 31 states lost hunters from 1995 to 2005. Massachusetts

lost nearly 41% of its hunters while Washington lost 36%, Rhode Island lost 33%, New Jersey lost 27%,

and Hawaii lost 26%. However, that means 19 states increased their number of hunters during that

decade. North Dakota gained a whopping 40%, Tennessee gained 29%, Oklahoma gained 27%,

Kentucky gained 19% and Arkansas hunter numbers increased 17%. Noticeably absent from these lists

are the “Big 3”. Texas, Pennsylvania and Michigan are the perennial leaders in hunter license sales and

from 1995 to 2005 Texas held steady with only a 2% decline while license sales dropped nearly 12% in Pennsylvania and nearly 16% in Michigan. That means Pennsylvania and Michigan each lost nearly as

many hunters during that time period as there are in North Dakota!




No Bubbas here – Data from NSSF showed in 2005 the average deer hunter was 41 years old, white

(96%), male (91%), and married (72%) with a household income of over $52,000. He also hunted deer

an average of 13 days per year (I’m guessing many of you reading this are far above average with

respect to that statistic), and nearly 20% had four or more years of college education!




Deer rule – The USFWS report showed deer hunting was nearly four times more popular than turkey

hunting (the next most sought after species). Deer hunting is popular across the U.S. but in some places

more so than others. For example, 96% of all hunting in Pennsylvania is for big game. Granted, we

have our share of ruffed grouse and waterfowl, and turkey and bear are included in the percentage of big

game hunting, but make no mistake that deer dominate the hunting scene in the Keystone state. Also

notable, big game hunting constituted 95% of the hunting in Maine, Michigan, New York and

Wyoming.




Hunting where and how – The USFWS report also showed 16% of big game hunters hunted only

public land while 61% hunted only private land. The rest hunted both. Of all hunters in 2006, 2.5

million (20%) used a muzzleloader, 3.5 million (28%) used a bow, and 11.6 million (93%) used a rifle,

shotgun or handgun. These statistics are encouraging as the number of archery and muzzleloader users continues to climb while the number of other firearms users remains high. This means more hunters are

taking advantage of additional opportunities and seasons, and that is good for hunter retention.




Hunter recruitment – Recruitment is retention’s companion. Fortunately the NSSF, U.S. Sportsmen’s Alliance (USSA) and National Wild Turkey Federation started the Families Afield Initiative in 2004.

The NSSF explains that Families Afield is an education and outreach program to help states create

hunting opportunities for youth. Some of the research-based core values of Families Afield include that

parents rather than politics should decide an appropriate hunting age for their children, and youths

should experience hunting with an adult mentor before attending a hunter education course. The USSA

adds that the program urges states to review and eliminate unnecessary hunting age restrictions and ease

hunter education mandates. The goal is to send more new hunters to hunter education classes and

reverse the trend of declining sportsmen’s numbers. Fortunately it’s working. Since 2005, 27 states

have enacted legislation lowering age barriers for new big game hunters. Through the REACH

program, QDMA has sent letters of support for Families Afield legislation to many of the above states’ legislators. As of spring 2008, more than 87,000 new hunters had taken to the field thanks to Families

Afield legislation.




Big bucks – According to data from the CSF report hunters spend more on their activity ($23 billion)

than the total revenues of McDonald’s. They also spend more on lodging ($614 million) than the

annual revenues of Comfort Inn, Comfort Suites, Quality Inn, Econolodge, Rodeway Inn and Sleep Inn combined. In 2006, the National Sporting Goods Association stated hunting and shooting-related

equipment surpassed golf in sales, making it number two on the athletic and sports equipment sales list.

Only exercise equipment generated more sales, and if hunting were rated as a corporation it would fall in the top 20% of the Fortune 500 list of America’s largest companies (ahead of Coca-Cola).




Even bigger impacts – Hunters contribute $4.2 billion each year just in state and local taxes. This is

enough to pay the average salaries of 454,000 firefighters, 476,870 teachers or 527,900 police officers. Hunters’ spending adds up to support close to 600,000 jobs and that’s more than the number of people employed by the McDonald’s corporation. Texas leads the list of states as Lone Star hunters spend $2.3 billion, support 47,000 jobs and contribute $262 million to state taxes and $310 million to federal taxes annually!




Hunting’s approval rating – I stated at the beginning of this article that only 5% of the U.S. population

16 years and older hunts. This number may appear small, but only 3% of Americans live the animal

rights philosophy. More importantly, 73% of Americans approve of hunting while only 10% believe it

should be illegal. These are encouraging numbers but we must be vigilant in our approach to stop the

overall decline in hunter numbers and then begin rebuilding them. There is no question the loss of

hunters negatively impacts our wildlife management programs and state wildlife agencies and threatens

the future of hunting. However, as hunters and wildlife managers we can best combat this by recruiting

from outside as well as within our ranks, by adhering to the highest ethical standards in our pursuits, and

above all by being good stewards of our natural resources and therefore a benefit to all society.



Kip’s Korner is written by Kip Adams, a Certified Wildlife Biologist and Northern Director of Education and Outreach for the Quality Deer Management Association (QDMA). The QDMA is an international nonprofit wildlife conservation organization dedicated to ethical hunting, sound deer management and preservation of the deer-hunting heritage. The QDMA can be reached at 1-800-209-DEER or www.QDMA.com.



Data used in this article was obtained from the following organizations:

Congressional Sportsmen’s Foundation – www.sportsmenslink.org

National Shooting Sports Foundation – www.nssf.org

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service – www.fws.org

U.S. Sportsmen’s Alliance – www.ussportsmen.org